Google's native multimodal flagship — text, audio, image, video and code in a single model with 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2.
Gemini vs Grok
Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro vs xAI's Grok 4.3 — multimodal reasoning vs real-time wit. Both have long context windows, but very different strengths.
xAI's flagship with real-time X data, 2M-token context, and a personality unlike any other major model.
| Gemini (3.1 Pro) | Grok 4.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M | 2M |
| Multimodal | Native (5 modalities) | Text + image |
| Real-time data | Via grounding | Native X integration |
| Reasoning | 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2 | Strong reasoning, direct style |
| Ecosystem | Google Cloud + Workspace | X, xAI API |
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro when multimodal understanding (especially video and audio) matters and you live in the Google ecosystem.
Pick Grok 4.3 when real-time X data and the longest context window in the industry are critical.
The verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the multimodal champion. Grok 4.3 is the real-time / long-context champion. Pick based on whether your data is multimodal or live.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which can process video, Gemini or Grok?
Gemini 3.1 Pro natively understands video content as part of its multimodal capabilities. Grok 4.3 does not natively process video files.
Which has better real-time data access?
Grok 4.3 has native integration with X for real-time public discourse data. Gemini uses Google Search grounding but lacks the same live social-media feed integration.